Descriptive analysis of inertia groups for dyslipidemia at primary health care centers in a Spanish region.

<p>Abbreviations: n(%), absolute frequency(relative frequency); TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p

Analysis of factors associated with inertia groups for dyslipidemia at primary health care centers in a Spanish region.

<p>Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; Adj. OR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.</p><p>Goodness-of-fit of the inertia models: TC: <i>X²</i> = 552.7, p<0.001; HDL-c: <i>X</i>² = 182.9, p<0.001; Combined: <i>X</i>² = 205.7, p<0.001.</p><p>OR adjusted for gender, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, age groups and the on-line course.</p><p>^*: Reference.</p

Main characteristics of the studies that evaluate clinical inertia in the diagnosis of dyslipidemia.

<p>Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVD, cardiovascular disease. *: This value was obtained through a weighted average. ^†: The sample size is not given in the original article. We therefore obtained it from linear programming mathematical calculations based on the Simplex method.</p

Nondyslipidemic patients at primary healthcare centers in a Spanish region.

<p>CI, confidence interval; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p

Area under the ROC curve for women (2.a) and men (2.b).

<p>The calculated cardiovascular risk correctly classified overall 78.9% (95%CI, 71.6-86.3) of the women and 78.0% (95%CI, 71.3-84.7) of the men (P<0.001 both).</p

Calibration data in risk tertiles.

<p>Mean predicted CVR (%) with the D’Agostino function versus actual events over 10.6 years of follow-up in risk tertiles (3.a women and 3.b men).</p